Punt.com sweepstakes casino is in the middle of the road when it comes to game libraries. It’s got fewer games than Ding Ding Ding with its library of 950+ but far exceeds other casinos like Golden Hearts Games with just 50+ titles.Punt.com does try to stand out with its six live dealers and eight tables games which is admirable. However it’s not quite up to the level of some of its competitors with the previously mentioned Ding Ding Ding having 18 table games nine live dealers and also 25 jackpots a game type that’s completely missing at Punt.com.Honestly this whole section is less about Punt.com being bad and more about most competitors being better. You’ll have a good time with the games here but I’d be lying if I said there weren’t better more varied libraries out there.

Punt.com is very much going for quality over quantity. Pragmatic Play Red Tiger Gaming BGaming and BETER Live are some of the biggest names in the industry and investing in bespoke software always yields better performance in the long run.It’s just hard to deny that a library of six providers is a little small. The lack of variety mentioned in the games section reflects this as a provider like Evoplay could have boosted the games library with more table games scratch cards and even bingo.Punt.com is still new though and providers are expensive. It makes sense to start with a few providers in the beginning and Punt.com has picked well with some of the biggest names providing the best games on their site.

I’m very happy with the large number of purchase options to choose from. All of the popular cards are available as well as several cryptocurrency options. It’s a shame there isn’t a unified transaction option for purchases and redemptions that could have made everything a bit smoother. An e-wallet like Skrill would have come in real handy here and increased the redemption options a bit. Still seven transaction methods are nothing to scoff at. If Punt.com adds in e-wallet transactions and a lower minimum purchase option of $1 then they’d easily have better payment options than their competitors.

Punt.com sweeps casino’s safety is top-notch. Few other sweeps casinos match Punt.com and only RealPrize can claim to be better.The 256-bit SSL with ECDSA technology is practically impossible to break especially since it’s stronger than the RSA variant. The TFA adds an extra layer of security and I like how the site forces you to verify your identity before you get the welcome bonus which helps keep underage gamblers off the site. I do wish some RG limiters were present such as time and gameplay limiters. RealPrize was able to include them so I don’t see why Punt.com can’t. Otherwise Punt.com’s RG section is great and you’ll be able to find everything you’ll need on their RG page.

Talk about an excellent support team. The answers were quick detailed and excellent with the team eager to assist me with any problem I had. It’s a shame that the live chat isn’t 24/7 though they do make up for it by having the bots defer to the exhaustive FAQ. Several bonus terms are unfortunately vague or left out of the FAQ but every other topic is covered extensively. I know it’s common for sweeps casinos to have phone numbers for payment issues only with Pulsz and Chanced doing it as well but I do wish this wasn’t the case. Phone support can be really helpful and it’s a shame to relegate it to only one type of issue.

Punt.com’s site is fine. It’s mostly functional (except those filters) and loads pretty quickly with no noticeable glitches.I have to be honest I’m not a big fan of the lime green color scheme. It’s not as easily visible as Zula’s blue-on-white color scheme and it just kind of makes the site look like a knock-off Matrix film. The color issue is arguably subjective to my tastes but what’s not subjective is those broken filters. They flat-out don’t work period. The ‘Punt Originals’ filter leaves out most of the original games and the ‘Live Dealers’ filter is full of normal table games and The Dog House slot for some reason. Punt.com’s site issues aren’t small and it doesn’t help that the search bar is fairly basic and cannot search for providers. Hopefully a fix is in the works to sort these issues out.